If you're familiar with vi then gvim should be no problem.  If you're not you can still use gvim in a windows compatible mode.  Either way gvim can be used as a pretty good (not to mention free) IDE. 

First go get gvim at http://www.vim.org/.

Then go get the project "script" at http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=69  If you can't find it try searching for "project"

Now you need to install a nice little ruby gem named "vim-ruby" 

   You can go this with the following steps:

•    gem install vim-ruby --remote
•    vim-ruby-install.rb

   from your command line of choice.

Now one last bit, to make sure you can enable folding which helps a lot with large files remember to do the following step:

To enable folding, download the patched ruby.vim file shown atop this page. Then put the following lines into .vimrc (or ~/.vim/plugin/ruby.vim):

 set foldmethod=syntax
 set foldtext=getline(v:foldstart)
 " you may try out this: set foldcolumn=3
 set fillchars=fold:\ " note the whitespace after  
 " not neccessary but useful (so you can use the TAB key to fold/unfold):
 map <TAB> za

-- originally found at http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?VimExtensions

You should be on productive dude after this!

ORM (Object Relation Mapping) is the new automatic memory management.  You wouldn’t want to go back to having manage pointers and allocate and de allocate memory.  This is how we advance.   The less unnecessary complexity the better.  I think most languages and platforms will eventually have this built in.  Rails provides Active Record which is based on a Martin Fowler pattern of the same name.  Java has hibernate, cocoon and about a hundred other frameworks most of which have/are being replicated into the .Net space.

So if you have a decent database design you can really take advantage of the ORM to make your life so much easier.  Of course queries can be optimized etc if you need them to be but all of this logic can be put into the Ruby (Java, .NET) language functions used to query the database.  Things like order by, limit, sorting can also be specified. 

The nice part is that the schema needs to make sense to be used.  The id field is always called “id”.  Foreign keys are always named with the tablename_id so it’s consistent.  That’s the advantage of Rails, there’s so much organization built in and you always know where pieces of code are going to be, ie models, views, controllers, libraries, etc.  

How many times have you opened someone’s project and had to hunt around trying to find what you are looking for.  

Why do we have 2 x 4’s?  Wouldn’t it be great if each carpenter could choose the dimensions of lumber to use for each project?  Why limit the choice? 

The answer is obvious or should be and the same thing goes for software development.  Microsoft has done a great disservice for developers by not mandating a coding standard which includes indentation and style along with project organization.  

This is the only way we can continue to handle more complexity; we must delegate some of it to the computer and use standards. 

When it comes to login or authentication schemes for web pages you have a few choices.  

1. Authenticate with email address and a password.
2. Authenticate with a user name (either system or user generated) and password.
3. Authenticate with an account number (or some relevant identifier) and password.
4. Authenticate with an account number (or some relevant identifier) and pin or other unique identifier (SSN, address, etc).

Each of these schemes has its own unique merits.  The most popular is probably number one above.  The email address is usually one of the easiest logins to remember.  However a potential stumbling block is the situation where multiple unique users share an email address.  It’s hard to believe that this seems logical to a person when email addresses are a free commodity.  

Number two is probably the second most popular as it eliminates the problem from number one, however it introduces the problem that a user must remember some kind of random user name because they probably won’t get the one they want as it will already have been taken.  This increases the possibility of support calls and user frustration.

Number four is becoming more common especially for financial services and other highly regulated or secure environments.  All information is meaningful and unique.

My preference is usually number one.  It’s common and easy to understand and the draw backs are easily remedied by the forcing of a unique email address.

I choose number four as my second choice.  It’s more complex to implement but it provides a higher level of security while using relevant customer/user information.  This would prove especially effective if the required login information changed randomly like many financial institutions authentication schemes.

As usual Joe is right on target with this article.  He explains why MS Project sucks for software projects (it's meant to manage construction of buildings not software) and why Excel is the most complicated tool you need to create a good software schedule.  I believe the SCRUM process also uses spreadsheets.  I had a colleague who was big on the SCRUM process and it seemed very promising in that it let the developer plan the work without a dog and pony show.

http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000245.html

I've often wondered if you could prove that the speadsheet is one of the most valuable pieces of technology ever, perhaps behind the hand calculator, email and the word processor.

Every once in a while you come across some truly innovative useful software.  Wink is that type of software.  It's a free application that can capture screen shots as either individual frames are as a mini movie which are then converted into single frames and can then be edited and eventually saved as a flash .swf or windows .exe file. 

I intend on using it for help systems and instructions for remote users.  Did I mention it's free?

All I can say is wow.

http://www.debugmode.com/wink/

@echo off
call :timer start
dir
call :timer
goto :eof

:timer
if /i "%1"=="start" set timer=
for /f "tokens=2-5 delims=:,." %%a in ('echo.^|time^|find /i
"current"') do (
  set hh=%%a
  set /a mm=1%%b-100,ss=1%%c-100,dd=1%%d-100
)
set /a hh=1%hh:~1,2%-100,timer=hh*3600000+mm*60000+ss*1000+dd*10-timer
if /i not "%1"=="start" echo elapsed time = %timer% msec
goto :eof

:eof

alt.msdos.batch.nt as posted by Garry Deane